Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Microsoft HAS harmed the OS market but I disagree with your feelings
about Unix. Unix has changed quite a bit over the years so it's not
exactly as if Unix today is the same as Unix in 1971. Also I think
you're wrong if you think Unix is fundamentally flawed. One of the
biggest problems software today has is that it has strayed from the Unix
way. Concepts such as small pluggable, easy to use, components and
everything as a file worked amazingly well and we've yet to find better
replacements. Software has gotten ever more complex and harder to use
largely because programmers look for more and more complicated means of
making useful abstractions. Unix components use simple streams to pass
data using standard interfaces that are simple to learn and use. Compare
that with the world of complex linked libraries, remote procedure calls,
undocumented file formats, huge monolithic applications, etc. In general
it's all the wrong way to go I think and is why we have such huge
bloated software today. Yes, Unix can be improved on but I don't think
what we need is so much a revolution as evolution. Take the concepts
that make Unix so good and build on them.
Most changes to Unix over the years that've been aimed at making it more
modern tend to just make it crappy and closer to Windows. MacOS and
Linux both suffer from this corruption as do every other Unix variant
I've seen. The desktop is largely to blame for this as Windowisms have
crept over and in general these methods and concepts just don't work as
well. MacOS is especially at fault at having given up the power of
XWindow without replacing it with something of comparable power. Just as
we're entering the network age they strip their Unix variant of it's
desktop networking abilities and replace it with a few weak imitations
and lots of eye candy. X needs a lot of work but it has some real gem
concepts that need to be kept.
On the subject of Microdoft in general - I happened to watch an
advertisment for Dell, an ad that was clearly aimed at the business
consumer. As part of their message on how cutting edge their
technology was, they talked about how it could use Linux. It shocks
me how Linux, which is based upon the decades old Unix, could still be
the choice of big business when they want reliability. I guess that
Microsoft's abuse of their monopoly power really has harmed consumers,
because by now their should be operating systems on the market that
clearly outshine any derivative of Unix. But sadly, that seems not to
be the case.
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion