MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Bayesian statistics (was "statistical inference")
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Bayesian statistics (was "statistical inference")
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Jonathan King wrote:

It's a pretty easy intro book, if you can remember your calculus (obviously not a problem for Stephen and Jon).

Well, I get embarassed sometimes when I realize I am not as fleet with this stuff as I should be. :-)

Well, I'll bet I was right about Stephen though!!

One thing I found is that in math stat, you do need calculus, but there isn't really much that you have to do to get by. Derivatives are always easy, partial derivatives are not any harder. Integration by parts is probably the hardest thing I found I needed to know to get through a course. Other trickier things are usually not needed for exams, so you can look stuff up when you are rusty. Mostly you need to understand what you are doing conceptually.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion