MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] statistical inference
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] statistical inference
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Jonathan King wrote:

The assumptions are unstated there but pretty obvious. I'm sure there are much more sophisticated approaches.

Many on that very search page. The person who did the artwork for the page you cited should be shot. :-)

Right. It's not really a problem for grammar school kids!


More seriously, if you took this setting and made it into one where you caught the fist one at a time and threw them back, it looks like you could develop a model that would allow you to estimate something about the total number of fish and the probability of catching each fish (which could be different for each fish) and maybe have something better to say about the total population of fish whose catpure probability exceeds some lower bound, or is less than some upper bound, or both.

I think you can make the two problems equivalent under some assumptions.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion