Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?

[Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Mike Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> > > Apparently, what came before had plenty of substance to it.  Much of 
> > > what Kennedy is doing is reviewing the facts.  What specifically do 
> > > you think is questionable in what he wrote?
> >
> >
> > That he included a great deal of hyperbole in with his facts.  Every 
> > other poster on MLUG, even those sympathetic to your cause, said that 
> > this article was over the top in its presentation.
>
>
>
> Your answer is that you question nothing in what he wrote.  You don't 
> like his style.  That's interesting, isn't it?

Yes, but I'm not sure to which extent he is telling the complete truth. 
 Sure I don't like his style, but people who write with kind of style 
usually distort certain facts.

Obviously I cannot say which facts are wrong because I don't know 
enough.  But the article Vern brought up did seem to comfirm my thoughts 
that he did distort some of the facts.

Stephen

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion