Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?

[Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

> > Apparently, what came before had plenty of substance to it.  Much of 
> > what Kennedy is doing is reviewing the facts.  What specifically do you 
> > think is questionable in what he wrote?
>
> That he included a great deal of hyperbole in with his facts.  Every 
> other poster on MLUG, even those sympathetic to your cause, said that 
> this article was over the top in its presentation.


Your answer is that you question nothing in what he wrote.  You don't like 
his style.  That's interesting, isn't it?

It's kinda like that with Al Gore's movie:  Well, I guess what he says is 
true, but he doesn't really give every side of every issue, and also I 
don't really like Al Gore, so why should I care about greenhouse gases and 
global warming?

Wake up, people!!  Get past the style and concern yourselves with the 
substance.  There is a lot of substance there, both in the election fraud 
issue and in global warming.  Try to go beyond the politics.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion