Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?

[Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Mike Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> > Why doesn't someone collect all the facts, write an article that 
> > presents them as is without distortion, and then maybe we can get an 
> > idea of where the truth lies.
> >
> > In the meantime, why should a media reporter think that these 
> > allegations have any more substance to them than anything that has 
> > come before?  Why should the mainstream media even bother to report 
> > that allegations have been made, let alone bother to look into them?
>
>
> Apparently, what came before had plenty of substance to it.  Much of 
> what Kennedy is doing is reviewing the facts.  What specifically do you 
> think is questionable in what he wrote?

That he included a great deal of hyperbole in with his facts.  Every 
other poster on MLUG, even those sympathetic to your cause, said that 
this article was over the top in its presentation.

Stephen

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion