MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] read this one on electronic voting and Diebold
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] read this one on electronic voting and Diebold
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Josh wrote:

The contentions on the chart, if true, are interesting. However, I don't see any evidence that the statistics/facts aren't the figment of the writer's imagination. Anyone have reputable sources to validate or disprove the contentions?

Try picking a few key words, typing them into google and reading what you get. I'm sure there is a lot out there!


You could read Kennedy's article and follow some of the 100+ references for more information:

http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/~mbmiller/vote_fraud_2004.html


You could read any of the three books cited here:

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10463875/was_the_2004_election_stolen_sources_and_commentary


You could read some of these official reports:

Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio
http://house.gov/judiciary_democrats/ohiostatusrept1505.pdf

Democracy at Risk: The 2004 Election in Ohio
The DNC investigation
http://podcast.rbn.com/rstone/rstone/download/misc/DNCsummary.pdf

Lucas Country Board of Elections -- Results of Investigations Following November 2004 General Election
http://podcast.rbn.com/rstone/rstone/download/misc/lucasinquiryrawstory.pdf


Analyses of Voter Disqualification, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, November 2004
http://podcast.rbn.com/rstone/rstone/download/misc/AnalysesFullReport.pdf


All of this was sent to you in previous messages.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion