Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Why doesn't someone collect all the facts, write an article that
presents them as is without distortion, and then maybe we can get an
idea of where the truth lies.
In the meantime, why should a media reporter think that these
allegations have any more substance to them than anything that has come
before? Why should the mainstream media even bother to report that
allegations have been made, let alone bother to look into them?
Apparently, what came before had plenty of substance to it. Much of what
Kennedy is doing is reviewing the facts. What specifically do you think
is questionable in what he wrote?
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact