Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] read this one on electronic voting and Diebold
- From: Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 13:39:26 -0700
- Delivery-date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:40:27 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
I think no voting machine should be allowed unless it leaves a clear
paper trail and all involved hardware and software is open to public
scrutiny. Voting should be transparent where no components are an
unknown black box. Diebold for example has proven themselves horrible at
security and disconcern for real issues with their machines. These types
of machines should be required to be opensource all the way.
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact