Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Vern Green wrote:
So how about a little more information to debunk Kennedy's article. At
Salon.com there is an article by Farhad Majoo. Not exactly the bastion
of conservatism over there at Salon, but his article is pretty
interesting.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/06/03/kennedy/
Did you see any of the user comments? They hate him.
My impression is that the original article was not without its
distortions, and this new article tends to support that. Quite likely
the new article has its own distortions as well. But how am I supposed
to know?
The user comments, as far as I read them, are just people ranting and
raving. They added nothing substantive to the debate.
Why doesn't someone collect all the facts, write an article that
presents them as is without distortion, and then maybe we can get an
idea of where the truth lies.
In the meantime, why should a media reporter think that these
allegations have any more substance to them than anything that has come
before? Why should the mainstream media even bother to report that
allegations have been made, let alone bother to look into them?
Stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact