Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] How Many Miles to the Bushel?
- From: "Vern Green" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 00:43:47 -0700
- Delivery-date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 01:44:54 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BEh3sYms/QsSZrtaqIojbAp8t4uJmNN+x8KsW/hAYFzLiLlBPaiuoHMkEQf0G3KQSIroTdEbRKAWV5gQ1B98JJ/cBJDzUcIQF+S2suPGUm8LuNF8av8hjMYL9PvHstTkTqfy6K2EwynIkHVKzW90HQEB5gsFHdcjv/F+qUzzX8k=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Much like hybrids, these alternative fuels are not about being cheaper
then gasoline, though some of them are, most of it has to do with
being cleaner.
I saw a report on the local news channel here recently about E85 and
the problem with it right now is the cost of creating the ethanol in
the first place. There was also mention that it is not nearly as
efficient as gasoline, so the cost goes even higher.
I think the real benefit in E85 is that it is cleaner burning and it
could potentially reduce our use of foreign oil.
On 5/30/06, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
So this article finds that E85 is twice as expensive to use as gasoline
and M85 is much worse than E85. Does that seem right? See below.
--Mike
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/27/business/media/27offline.html
N.Y. Times
May 27, 2006
What's Offline
How Many Miles to the Bushel?
By PAUL B. BROWN
TOO often, discussions of alternative energy take place in an alternative
universe where prices do not matter," Popular Mechanics reports.
To remedy that, the magazine set out to figure out what it would cost to
drive from New York to California using seven types of fuel.
It was not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison. Because there was not
one automobile that could handle all types of fuel, the magazine tried to
match the cars as closely as possible in size and weight. And the price it
used for gasoline -- $2.34 a gallon -- is about 20 percent less than most
people are now paying at the pump.
Still, the results in the cover article by Mike Allen are intriguing and
surprising. The cheapest fuel was electricity. About one ton of coal would
be needed to produce the requisite energy. Cost to drive coast to coast:
$60. Using compressed natural gas would set a driver back $110. And
biodiesel, made of used vegetable oil in the magazine's example, would
cost $231.
Gasoline, as it turns out, figured in the middle of the pack. It would
take 4.5 barrels of crude oil to produce the 91 gallons of gasoline
necessary to get a Honda Civic coast to coast. The cost would be $213.
On the high end were E85/ethanol, a mixture of 85 percent ethanol and 15
percent gasoline, at $425, and M85/methanol, 85 percent methanol and 15
percent gasoline, at $619. And then there was hydrogen. It would require
16,000 cubic feet of hydrogen to power General Motors' Hy-wire concept
car: $804.
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
--
Thanks
F Vernon Green
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion