MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
If you want to see what others are saying, check this out:

http://news.google.com/news?q=2004+election+kennedy

That list of articles will continue to grow and change over the coming days.

I really can't appreciate the writers who say "this is all old stuff." Fine, maybe those writers have never heard of a review article. How much of the information in Kennedy's article is known to the average person? Very little.

On the other hand, I do appreciate any facts about what Kennedy has omitted or distorted. That kind of analysis is very important. Writers who take the article seriously and take some time to carefully document any errors, omissions or distortions will do us all a service.

That said, articles that are already published are likely to be a little too slapdash. Kennedy's article was only posted in the evening of June 1.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion