MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I have to agree with Michael on this one...frankly, I'd rather see the random, uninformed passerby on the street than the self-serving career jackasses we're offered on the ballot.

Rick

Michael wrote:
Give it a break already. It doesn't really matter how the states were encouraged to throw their votes. They can decide to flip a coin to decide and it's still legal. If they want to base their decision on faulty machines, corrupt election counting practices, stupid voters, etc that is perfectly within their right. I'll begin to seriously worry about election fraud the day that anyone that isn't corrupt or stupid can actually be made a serious candidate. Until then it hardly matters if they just pick random people off the street - in fact I'd probably say that random people would be better choices.
--
We simply can't idiot-proof everything. Sometimes the idiots just have to suffer and die.
--http://www.overheardintheoffice.com/


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion