MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Michael wrote:

It doesn't really matter how the states were encouraged to throw their votes. They can decide to flip a coin to decide and it's still legal. If they want to base their decision on faulty machines, corrupt election counting practices, stupid voters, etc that is perfectly within their right.

Is there a state where the people decided that they wish to base their choice of elector on fraudulent vote counts? In other words, is there a state that accepts fraud as a method of producing counts which are then used to choose electors? If so, please tell me which state you have in mind.


Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion