Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?

[Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Give it a break already. It doesn't really matter how the states were 
encouraged to throw their votes. They can decide to flip a coin to 
decide and it's still legal. If they want to base their decision on 
faulty machines, corrupt election counting practices, stupid voters, etc 
that is perfectly within their right. I'll begin to seriously worry 
about election fraud the day that anyone that isn't corrupt or stupid 
can actually be made a serious candidate. Until then it hardly matters 
if they just pick random people off the street - in fact I'd probably 
say that random people would be better choices.
> You have to check out this article by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.  It was 
> just posted a few hours ago in the online Rolling Stone:
>
> http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/~mbmiller/vote_fraud_2004.html
>
> That single-page version of it is much more convenient than the 
> original for printing (the original is spread across four separate 
> pages).  It also has clickable links in the reference section, unlike 
> the original.
>
> The information presented in that article makes me absolutely furious. 
> Our evidence-to-action ratio is embarassingly high.  How can the press 
> be so uninterested in such an important thing.  There should have been 
> a constant stream of articles about it ever since November 2004.  
> Election fraud is a very, very serious crime and the punishment should 
> be harsh.


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion