Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS] Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
- From: Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:47:51 -0500 (CDT)
- Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:48:57 -0500
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
You have to check out this article by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. It was just
posted a few hours ago in the online Rolling Stone:
http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/~mbmiller/vote_fraud_2004.html
That single-page version of it is much more convenient than the original
for printing (the original is spread across four separate pages). It also
has clickable links in the reference section, unlike the original.
The information presented in that article makes me absolutely furious.
Our evidence-to-action ratio is embarassingly high. How can the press be
so uninterested in such an important thing. There should have been a
constant stream of articles about it ever since November 2004. Election
fraud is a very, very serious crime and the punishment should be harsh.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion