Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Christian M. Cepel wrote:
I find your argument to be a non-starter. I'm sure it would cost a heck
of a lot less to find and deport a family from a point furthest from
than it would to pay for their health-care, welfare, and schooling costs
for a year... for two years... for three years... You see, even if it's
not immediate, those costs still win in the end because with the one
scenario, there is an upfront expense and then no more expense, and with
the other, there is a large constantly compounding expense.
Do you think that illegal immigrants are on welfare? What percentage? I
have some doubts.
Do you think that if you deport them, they won't come back?
How much do you think it costs to find 12 million people and move them to
other countries?
My argument is a "non starter"? You guys never cease to amaze. Are you
getting this bullshit from Fox News or something? How can you think you
are making sense?
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact