Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Mike Miller wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Rick Buford wrote:
Does this imply that I'm the anti-christ for not acknowledging Jesus?
Rick
I think that this passage refers to those who say that they are
"Christians" but teach a different gospel. Since I don't think you
claim to be a Christian, I think that you would be refered to as
"unbeliever" rather than "antichrist."
(I put "Christian" in quotes, because the term was not very widely
used at that time.)
It is interesting that you have to be a Christian to qualify as an
antichrist. The whole idea of Christ/antichrist is a little amusing.
Do other religions have that?: e.g., antibuddha or antimohammed?
Christianity seems to have a little built-in paranoia.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
The word "anti-christ" seems to be a joining of two Greek words "anti"
(which I guess means "opposite"?) and "christ" (which I think means
"king"). Presumably readers of that time would have understood the word
in that sense - maybe it means something like "a person who is the
opposite to Christ." I'm not a Greek scholar so I really don't know.
But I doubt that John meant to use the word in the bogy-man sense that it
means to us today.
Except that I am obviously wrong, because had I looked more carefully at
the context I would have seen the prior verse to that which I cited - 1
John 2:18
... and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many
antichrists have come....
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion