Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: "MLUG Off-Topic Discussion" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] RAM for Ubuntu
- From: "Jonathan King" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:17:44 -0600
- Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:17:54 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oHC3UcjimEs5xc352cUEtXNWP69YTuqt0Z9G/XTlXMSqGkh0Mdy9v9zc38dju1Omn06IsIrC3C7IvIZGSZGK8kgoKh1WHUxA9BigIjZXhzEWXC3QXAN/va5e4cLTW7XXLh+yfOyhO1mxwKohJkVAf4fEGyHfn8/ccHNTc3QixKE=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
On 4/4/06, Shawn Parker <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> why not just use a bigger swap?
I don't think I was suffering from lack-of-swap thrash, but just plain
old not-enough-RAM to-run-Firefox-or-OpenOffice.org thrash. Going
from 192 MB to 384 MB helped a _lot_.
But, yeah: I could try adjusting the swap space size, too.
jking
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact