Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jonathan King wrote:
Evidently, they think that can store it all, which makes sense since
gmail accounts are pretty much flawless at almost 3 gigs apiece now.
Remember that they are not using 3GB per user. They are giving me 2701
MB, but I'm using 557 MB, and I'll bet that few people are using that much
(I know that some of you use more, but you are not the norm!) They also
seem to be using linking strategies so that my 557 MB probably doesn't
really use up that much space.
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/060307/google_storage.html
I whipped through the slide presentation they refer to in the article,
and I have to say that this is exactly what I suspected they would
eventually want to do. Now, of course, whether *you* want to trust them
with your data is another question. I'm fairly enthusiastic about it in
the abstract, but the devil is in the details.
I'm impressed with the idea, but I wonder why they don't want to do web
hosting. Any idea? Web hosting seems like a logical service for Google
to offer. Maybe the problem is that they don't want to control how web
pages are formatted, so the can't put ads on the web pages.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion