Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] another pie in the sky Columbia airline plan...
- From: "Christian M. Cepel" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:54:59 -0600
- Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:55:56 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
I thought KCI was a hub with it's Internation Airport designation. This
is not so?
Jonathan King wrote:
So some people have noticed that there is a gap to be filled in the
air transportation front:
http://www.digmo.com/news/story.php?ID=18649
Now, the problems with this proposal are obvious:
1) Using Jeff City's airport is just not a very good idea; it isn't
approved for this use, and it's a 30 mile drive for the majority of
your customers, who are coming from Columbia, and not Jeff City.
2) It's unclear that turbo-prop service is the way to go at this
point, although I guess it's your only decent choice if you're doing
the KC-midMo-StL loop.
3) $80 one way reduces enthusiasm, especially if you are only using
19-seater aircraft.
4) Neither KC nor StL are major hub airports, so it's unclear why you
would target them for your service unless it somehow meant you could
use fewer planes or something.
And there are others. At some point, I suspect somebody will
seriously make a go of it with a carrier that goes between Columbia
and (say) Chicago, but it could take a while.
jking
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion