Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Apple Mac mini systems...
- From: "George B. Robb III" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 07:49:27 -0600
- Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 07:49:33 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED, MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051016)
Also consider that Apple has full access to the true Intel compiler with
all the optimizations they could ever desire... Just think of your
standard out of the box i386 2.6 vanilla Linux kernel on a Pentium 4 vs
a recompiled 2.6 kernel with the cruft trimmed away optimized for that
Pentium 4. Hands down much faster... Also the Apple optimized kernel
has a very limited, and very well designed set of closed hardware that
it has to deal with, forget the options of i386 support or Via and SiS
chip sets.
George
Jonathan King wrote:
On 2/28/06, Jerry Gamblin <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
Did they say it was 5* faster then the last MacMini? I'll always have
a memory of the intel chip on the slug.
The "Core duo" Intel version is allegedly 4-5x faster than the Mini or
things like SPECfp. And that makes sense; this is the new Intel
notebook chip set and it evidently is quite a bit faster than the last
generation, especially the dual core version which had no equivalent
before. But there are other changes too, notably the speed of the
front side bus and I think the amount of cache.
jking
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion