MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS][RELIGION] Few Biologists but Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS][RELIGION] Few Biologists but Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sorry, I hit send too soon...

"Another signer is Dr. Gregory J. Brewer, a professor of cell biology at the Southern Illinois University medical school. Like other skeptics, he readily accepts what he calls "microevolution," the ability of species to adapt to changing conditions in their environment. But he holds to the opinion that science has not convincingly shown that one species can evolve into another."

If they agree that micro-evolution occurs, then how can big-E evolution even be in doubt? i.e., if m-e (micro-evolution) occurs, and takes hundreds of generations to do so, then doesn't that obliterate the "world is 6000 years old" theory?

"Discovery officials said that they did not ask the religious beliefs of the signers and that such beliefs were not relevant. John G. West, a senior fellow at Discovery, said it was "stunning hypocrisy" to ask signers about their religion "while treating the religious beliefs of the proponents of Darwin as irrelevant.""

Ok, at this point, they really lose all semblance of credibility, especially in the light of the earlier statements:

"Of the signers who are evangelical Christians, most defend their doubts on scientific grounds but also say that evolution runs against their religious beliefs.

Several said that their doubts began when they increased their involvement with Christian churches."

K, I'm kinda liking this guy:

"Dr. Salthe, who describes himself as an atheist, said that when he signed the petition he had no idea what the Discovery Institute was. Rather, he said, "I signed it in irritation."

He said evolutionary biologists were unfairly suppressing any competing ideas. "They deserve to be prodded, as it were," Dr. Salthe said. "It was my way of thumbing my nose at them."

Dr. Salthe said he did not find intelligent design to be a compelling theory, either. "From my point of view," he said, "it's a plague on both your houses."

Rick


Mike Miller wrote:
Check this out (from NY Times):

http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/rmnews/2006/msg00076.html

My comment:

I would like to know how many that signed the petition discussed below would also sign a petition that said "there is no God" or "Jesus was not the son of God" or "a woman's right to choose to have an abortion must be maintained" or even "I voted for John Kerry in 2004." In other words, this is all about ideology and religion and not about science. After withstanding nearly 150 years of constant, hostile opposition, the essentials of Darwinian theory are now established as solidly as those of any theory in any science.

Mike



_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion