Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [POLITICS][RELIGION] Few Biologists but Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition
- From: Rick Buford <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:08:37 -0600
- Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:09:37 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025)
Sorry, I hit send too soon...
"Another signer is Dr. Gregory J. Brewer, a professor of cell biology at
the Southern Illinois University medical school. Like other skeptics, he
readily accepts what he calls "microevolution," the ability of species
to adapt to changing conditions in their environment. But he holds to
the opinion that science has not convincingly shown that one species can
evolve into another."
If they agree that micro-evolution occurs, then how can big-E evolution
even be in doubt? i.e., if m-e (micro-evolution) occurs, and takes
hundreds of generations to do so, then doesn't that obliterate the
"world is 6000 years old" theory?
"Discovery officials said that they did not ask the religious beliefs of
the signers and that such beliefs were not relevant. John G. West, a
senior fellow at Discovery, said it was "stunning hypocrisy" to ask
signers about their religion "while treating the religious beliefs of
the proponents of Darwin as irrelevant.""
Ok, at this point, they really lose all semblance of credibility,
especially in the light of the earlier statements:
"Of the signers who are evangelical Christians, most defend their doubts
on scientific grounds but also say that evolution runs against their
religious beliefs.
Several said that their doubts began when they increased their
involvement with Christian churches."
K, I'm kinda liking this guy:
"Dr. Salthe, who describes himself as an atheist, said that when he
signed the petition he had no idea what the Discovery Institute was.
Rather, he said, "I signed it in irritation."
He said evolutionary biologists were unfairly suppressing any competing
ideas. "They deserve to be prodded, as it were," Dr. Salthe said. "It
was my way of thumbing my nose at them."
Dr. Salthe said he did not find intelligent design to be a compelling
theory, either. "From my point of view," he said, "it's a plague on both
your houses."
Rick
Mike Miller wrote:
Check this out (from NY Times):
http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/rmnews/2006/msg00076.html
My comment:
I would like to know how many that signed the petition discussed below
would also sign a petition that said "there is no God" or "Jesus was not
the son of God" or "a woman's right to choose to have an abortion must
be maintained" or even "I voted for John Kerry in 2004." In other words,
this is all about ideology and religion and not about science. After
withstanding nearly 150 years of constant, hostile opposition, the
essentials of Darwinian theory are now established as solidly as those
of any theory in any science.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion