Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] The eminent victory of spam
- From: Shawn Parker <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:53:17 -0600
- Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:53:29 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nMaBWAcgK6gi/s1sSxzcmECVGHn81fl7EfWlpDokMQDRe12eO+BVKNfQ6otI3r9CP9wgMxQFoRRdVsKfAjcxhtRw347Or5tywLxfib1Ly66zNm1GztriPJEaIR6TktmXr8AyDROrhKEFdFWnvr9BCxPGMTVDDk5yBXTfZ8ee+qE=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
is this like that fake rumor that circulates the web every so many
years about an "email tax?"
http://hoaxbusters.ciac.org/HBUrbanMyths.shtml#emailtax
has this actually been confirmed? i mean, for a week every blog and
news site in the industry touted google's upcoming ubuntu desktop
release, too.
On 2/6/06, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Huggard, Arthur Charles (UMC-Student) wrote:
>
> > "AOL and Yahoo are going to start charging anywhere from 1/4¢ to 1¢ to
> > guarantee that messages will wind up in the inboxes of the recipients.
> > Free e-mail will still be accepted, but there will be no guarantee that
> > it will find its way through the spam filters and into users' inboxes.
> > In the case of AOL, free e-mail is also likely to be delivered without
> > included images and URLs." -
> > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060205-6116.html
> >
> >
> > So, if I was an AOL or Yahoo user my Inbox will now be filled with spam,
> > and my "Junk Mail" folder would be empty. I thought Symantec said in
> > their last Annual report that the current trend of malware was to the
> > creation of zombie-machine networks that could be hired out. The spam
> > network owner(s) jack up their price a bit and then this becomes a
> > reality for all of the AOL and Yahoo members. Doesn't this completely
> > defeat the purpose of junk mail filters?? Does this offend/scare anyone
> > else? Personally I'm glad I have Google for a non-university email
> > account, and as long as Google keeps their motto, I'll be safe.
>
>
> I'm not sure I understand their plan fully, but it sounds like they will
> deliver mail for some commercial groups that might not have known the
> email addresses in the first place. That would be wrong.
>
> Gmail does a fine job of spam filtering. I would not request any change
> in the way Gmail is working for me, so maybe if I were on AOL, I'd just
> dump them and go to free Gmail.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
>
--
shawn
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion