Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] [MLUG][Politics] State of the Union
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:03:22 -0600
- Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:03:33 -0600
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Organization: University of Missouri
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060127
Mike Miller wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I'm listening to a rerun of Tim Kaine's speech. His main point seems
to be that the Bush government is running the country in an
incompetent fashion.
I think that this is a rather difficult accusation to make. The
problem is to know whether the fault for mistakes can be laid at
Bush's foot, or whether they can be laid at others getting in the way,
or whether the problems are so difficult that mistakes are impossible
to avoid and no-one else could do much better.
The usual accusation is that Bush doesn't listen to people and he
appoints friends, and their friends, to important positions they are not
prepared for. The FEMA director "Brownie" and the Katrina disaster are
what really hurt him. I don't know if Bush is incompetent, but it seems
like it.
It does look like the appointment of Brown to FEMA was a genuinely bad
and preventable decision. The poorness of this decision was excabated
by the rather poor response of the local government. I think that if
Bush were asked today (as he was during the last election season) what
his big mistakes were, he could talk about his appointment of Brown -
not that he would say it this way, because I notice that he shows great
loyalty towards his employees, but he might talk about the general
failure of the executive branch to respond adequately.
Bush's lack of willingness to publically face up to his mistakes is one
of his weaknesses. But I think one would be hard put to find an
effective leader who both shows the kind of singlemindedness of purpose
that has been required recently, who is also able to openly admit his
mistakes when they happen - typically those are character qualities that
are in opposition. That is why I am prepared to put up with this weakness.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion