Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] DNA Offers New Insight Concerning Cat Evolution

[Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Vern Green wrote:

> By the way, here are some of the links I have checked out, I do not 
> expect you to be convinced, I don't even expect you to read them, but 
> since i referred to them, I had better post them.
>
> http://www.allaboutcreation.org/evidence-for-evolution.htm
worthless.

> http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/
"A Theory In Crisis" - that part is 100% bullshit.  Who writes these 
things?


> http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,853982,00.html
right - we are genetically related to mice.  no news there.


> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12799463&dopt=Citation
right - we are genetically related to chimps too.


> http://www.wasdarwinright.com/homology-f.htm
I don't have time to read it all, but the part about sequence of 
Cytochrome C was bullshit.


> http://www.whyevolution.com/chimps.html
> http://www.whyevolution.com/eosimias.html
Now I know where you got some of your incorrect ideas on how to interpret 
the MHC sequence data in human and chimp.  More bullshit.

Vern-- If you want to know something, and I expect that you don't, you 
should read books in biology and genetics or take college courses. 
Otherwise, why not just believe that "God did it" and leave it at that? 
Why waste your time reading bullshit that only misleads you?  Just say 
that God created the world, animals and people, and spend your time 
studying computers.  Seriously.

Mike

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion