Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Computer Crime
- From: Shawn Parker <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:05:38 -0600
- Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:06:16 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K07VtbOxFKVWVoT86zqRXbgmltOQ368W6JR4Beop9dTxEDRjKUVVK+366o57kz0XNwUF2lVZDU6wU4SebuVXFb2SU1grcmBoZXqUY1MXTH2Kw2iiSCGJxMr49my00HU+KQWgL6HScs3FTrJa9Hvhn+1zWgUJAYUHyMYp+bCfUto=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
i think some time on OSS would be a fitting punishment. his intention
was malicious whether his execution was technically sound or not.
but, it's not worthy of a felony conviction.
On 1/6/06, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Spurling, Shannon wrote:
>
> > This is my personal opinion, but... this would be more like a person on
> > an airline encouraging every one to stop their feet to bring the plane
> > down. It's rude and infantile, but hardly distructive. If it were, they
> > need to get a funding increase to replace the 386 with windows 3.11 they
> > are using for a web server.
>
> What should we do with someone who turns on his cell phone in mid flight
> in an attempt to bring a plane down? It won't do a damned thing but I
> would be very happy to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law. He's
> trying to bring a plane down! I would be concerned that after a few
> trials and errors he might come up with an approach that is more likely to
> succeed.
>
>
> > I agree, it needs to be handled internally. The kid needs an attitude
> > adjustment, not a criminal record.
>
> I can agree with that. Not everything needs to go to the courts. But the
> legal issues seem pretty straight-forward to me. He will almost certainly
> be found guilty. It's important for the law to take seriousness into
> account. I'm sure they will do that and he won't go to jail.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
--
shawn
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion