Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Computer Crime
- From: Jerry Gamblin <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:09:53 -0600
- Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:10:32 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eM9s59M0LhXr2NmLz64nvYKBU+c/3OMhRvTJHo/Z2H09FXPf0M3GzTINCXfjSCnkPhhGdqzs33a7mPNk0WAryYkt42WlUNRTywlsR6br2O7LpGurYuV+nT7PIJQE7KdifK7T+Z8wK3JaKTOHJzxHz9O0D4nWoI2MdNCgwSxfp9E=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
> But what is the legal principle here? If the kid is trying to attack his
> school's computer, and he has a way of doing it, and the school claims
> that it was partly successful (they may be wrong), are we supposed to let
> him off the hook because of his weak technical skills?
>
> I suppose if we apprehended terrorists working on a nuclear bomb, and a
> technical expert reviewed their work and concluded that their plans were
> rather poor and could never have resulted in a working H bomb, we should
> let them go and apologize for inconveniencing them.
Well if you want to be hyperbole about it I guess you could charge any
kid who sprays you with a water gun with attempted murder because they
could have caused you to drown.
I think the kid should be punished but charging someone with a felony
for this is beyond ridiculous.
--
Thanks,
Jerry Gamblin
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion