Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact|
I've pretty much stopped visiting wikipedia after an experience I had
there a while back. One of their articles contained an absolute factual inaccuracy, so I corrected it and left a nice note in the comments indicating why I had corrected it. A while later, someone changed it back with absolutely no explanation. So, I left a longer explanation of why it was wrong the way it was and corrected it again. Again, someone changed it back. This time, another individual reinstated my changes. And again, this guy undid them.. then had wiki issue a 24 hour ban on me! I got the ban lifted in about an hour by emailing an admin with a full explanation, but the article contains the error to this day and the people at wiki seem to have an agenda to keep errors like it in place. Basically, one of the admins strongly supports one belief system and seems to systematically modify articles and ban posters who disagree with him/her, regardless of factual accuracy. He even left messages on my "talk board" criticizing me for my beliefs after the fact and his talk board is full of similar stories from other posters. Its their site and they have the right to run it as they please - but it drives me nuts that they claim "neutral point of view" as a goal when their own admins strongly support one POV over another and use administrative powers as a form of censorship. Its still a great site to answer a quick "who, what where?" type question..but don't count on it for any sort of accuracy. Josh. Jonathan King wrote: On 1/1/06, Christian M. Cepel <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote: |
_______________________________________________ discussion mailing list EMAIL:PROTECTED http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion