Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Korean stem cell rout...
- From: Vern Green <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 22:10:16 -0800
- Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:10:51 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=syhSG1ofYYEU43NzJCvCBY8X2yqojUpD72pdQvL0T9H9vn5so/sjLOiXE9NFKVgU/XrDF7sMfDoZ/xwiIo2G5AN4QivW761mLV96GVDwPit6KAfTIVWTqR62zJNAHn+ppN7xReZGiQ3fmaryhBlm4QcGu8y6o76gphqbZCAkTVY=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
Bush said there were 60 lines.
Bush also allotted 250 million in funding on stem cell research.
On 1/1/06, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> Christian M. Cepel wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Jonathan King wrote:
> >>
> >>> I now Mike is really annoyed by Bush's order, and I am, too. But what
> >>> annoys me most was the fact that Bush was told that we did not, in
> >>> fact, have really enough existing stem cell lines to support near- to
> >>> mid-term research as a matter of fact, but Bush claimed that we did.
> >>> In retrospect, it was one of the first well-known cases where the
> >>> administration twisted or invented facts so that they appeared to
> >>> support a policy position that was developed independently of the
> >>> facts.
> >
> >
> > I've never understood this argument at all, and I've suspected duplicity
> > on the part of those who make it. Probably just my ignorance... Feel
> > free to educate me.
> >
> > Why is more than one stem cell 'line' even necessary except perhaps as a
> > way to increase the speed of production of stem cells for research.
> >
> > Is a stem cell differentiated from the stem cell of another embryo in
> > such a way that different 'varieties' must be available for different
> > research. I had thought the very definition of stem cell was that there
> > was no differentiation.... that it was a blank slate.
> >
> > I've really been under the impression that if you started out with one
> > stem cell and managed to duplicate it and then duplicate those and so on
> > and so forth that you would have all the stem cells you need, but that
> > mortality and time were reasons people wanted to do 'multiple lines'
> > simultaneously to produce more cells for research exponentially more
> > quickly.
> >
> > Please explain to me the concept of a 'line' and why X number of 'lines'
> > is not sufficient, but Y number of 'lines' would be.
> >
> > Also, please reacquaint me with the numbers. I seem to recall there
> > being 32 available and that it was something like 50 that were wanted
> > when Bush said, "Read my lips, no more 'lines', go with whatcha got."...
> > I'm probably nowhere in the ballpark here. It's been quite a while.
>
> And I would like to know what a "line" is - how they get stem cells, and
> what they actually deliver to the doctor/researcher.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
--
Thanks
F Vernon Green
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion