Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Jonathan King wrote:
I now Mike is really annoyed by Bush's order, and I am, too. But what
annoys me most was the fact that Bush was told that we did not, in
fact, have really enough existing stem cell lines to support near- to
mid-term research as a matter of fact, but Bush claimed that we did.
In retrospect, it was one of the first well-known cases where the
administration twisted or invented facts so that they appeared to
support a policy position that was developed independently of the
facts.
Maybe you could provide more details for this one, because I hadn't
heard about this elsewhere. My recollection at the time was that there
was the claim that stem cell lines existed, but I don't remember any
claims about it being sufficient.
Another point that my right wing email newletters make - as you said it
basically means that the government isn't allowed to fund further stem
cell lines. But that doesn't stop private industry from doing the same.
Their point is that private industry has chosen not to do this, and
the question is "why?" - the presumption being that private companies
don't think it has a big enough chance of actually producing anything
useful. I have to admit that I am not knowledgable enough to know if
their presumption is reasonable.
Stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion