Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] summary of debate about news sources

["Christian M. Cepel" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Fair enough.  I misunderstood.  It was an outrageous claim.  Like other 
things, if I find the original information I'm citing, I'll post it later.

Thanks.


Mike Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Christian M. Cepel wrote:
>
> > I don't recall making any outrageous claims Mike.  I related to you a 
> > second-hand account from someone I know to be entirely truthful.
> >
> > Frankly, I don't care for your haughty attitude or the aspersions 
> > you've cast upon the honesty of myself an my friends, whom you really 
> > know nothing about.
>
>
> It wasn't really about your friends.  With regard to your friends' 
> story, you can say whatever you please and no one has any way of 
> checking the truth of the story.  If anyone doubts that it is a true 
> story they are "casting aspersions" on your and your friends.  Well, 
> that wasn't even what I was responding to.  I was responding to this:
>
>   Fiddlesticks!  There have been studies in the past year about people
>   being pushed to have abortions, especially in free and community and
>   student clinics.  I'll have to see if I can find them.  They were very
>   very disturbing.  I think one of the stories was in Focus on the
>   Family's Citizenlink.
>
> I consider that to be an outrageous claim.  The fact that it was in 
> "Focus on the Family's Citizenlink" only makes it seem more dubious.  
> Why would a clinic worker want someone to have an abortion?  Is it 
> because they make money that way?  Where is the evidence?
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion