Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
We read some Popper and Lakatos in grad school. I've read a few other
things. It is possible to come up with all sorts of difficult and
elaborate ideas and never really get a final answer. There are probably
thousands of people publishing all the time on philosophy of science
issues. What is stopping them from figuring it all out? Well, I think
there is no perfect solution and science is a complicated process that
doesn't work by some perfect rules. This allows philosophers to go on
and on making money (publishing and not perishing) forever.
"There is nothing so ridiculous but some philosopher has said it."
--Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 B.C. - 43 B.C.)
I don't believe that philosophers are motivated by making money. They
genuinely wish to resolve these issues. Some people may feel like you
do that there is no point because we will never find the answers, but
there are other people like me who just cannot put these questions down.
When I came across the work of Popper my reaction wasn't "why did he
waste his time with this kind of stuff" - rather it was "there is really
someone else who thinks this is important" - I had been battling with
these ideas and thoughts long before.
I have worked hard during my years of life to try to discern what
reality is and what it is not. In coming to believe in the Christian
God, I have used all my senses, and all my intellect, to come to that
conclusion.
I believe you when you say that you are trying your best to get the
right answer. I just don't think you've succeeded.
And I think that you have missed a lot. As Hamlet put it:
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of
in your philosophy.
Stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion