Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
I've never met a "first mover" (your term, not theirs) who would be
confused by such a sophomoric argument. It just proves that you don't
understand their belief.
In the beginning there was God. Period. Nothing else. God is beyond
our feeble understanding and perception of the universe, time, etc.
We take it on Faith that God understands the assertion where we do
not, and do not have to.
I think the point is that anyone can say, and believe, that in the
beginning was anything. It's the grand assumption that gives us
something to build the rest of our arguments against. For everyone it's
an assumption and is seemingly totally impossible to prove or disprove
because no argument yet argued seems to really explain where everything
came from. Everything is usually created from coming from somewhere or
some being but nobody can say where that somewhere or some being came from.
I solve this problem, for myself, by just erasing the assumption that
things must come from somewhere. It makes just as much sense for
everything to always have existed as it does to expect that everything
had to come from somewhere and removes any confussion about where
everything was if nowhere existed yet. :)
The same Faith is required to accept the seemingly blatant
impossibility and contradiction that is the Trinity.
That never really seemed impossible on a contradiction to me. It's only
hard to grasp if you're thinking of objects in the physical sense. Think
in a software sense and it's perfectly logical that three objects can be
the same as one object and yet maintain their own uniqueness. I expect
this to start happening to humans as we start to leave our mortal bodies
for interesting upgrades like becoming a mix of software and nanotech. A
simpler explanation is just to think of a good marriage. Two people
become one in almost every way. Their bodies and minds begin to mingle.
They are still themselves but they also become a 'we'.
--
Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
http://kavlon.org
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion