Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Rick Buford wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
But I really feel that you have ducked the main question.
How is it that we really rigorously know that the scientific method is
going to work?
When you get in a plane, do you trust it will fly? When you take
medicine, do you get better?
I'm sorry Stephen, but you are doing the same thing Christian accused
Mike of earlier. If you're not wearing skins from animals you killed
with flint weapons, then science quite obviously works.
I'll say more if there are more replies, but for now let me simply say
this. The question "how is it that we rigorously know that science
works" is not some obtuse question that I have dreamed up to try to
outwit atheists I might talk to. It is a question that bothered me
greatly in my teenage years, caused me to read about mathematical logic
in my college years, and obviously has bothered not only me but a lot of
other rather bright people (Popper, Kuhn, Polanyi, Descartes, Haldane,
Medawar, probably even Einstein if I had read enough of his writings).
I trust that the plane I get in will fly, but it is a matter of
convenience or necessity rather than a sense that it is knowledge of
which I have rigorous proof. I have to live my life day by day, get
food on the table, find things to enjoy, etc, but this doesn't answer
these deep unanswerable questions (as Popper called them).
Stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion