Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Mike Miller wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Why not just drop "God" out of the picture. It adds nothing.
Nothing but a warm feeling in a believer's heart, I suppose. You
believe it because you like believing it.
You have hit the nail on the head. Briefly, the reason most believers
believe in a God is not because there is some mystery of "how" things
came into place, but because they cannot answer the question of "why"
things came into place.
The typical atheist answer to the "why" question is that this question
is unimportant or even meaningless. Nevertheless, most human beings
have this deep rooted desire to know the answer to this question, and
a sense that this question is of the utmost importance, even if they
are unable to properly articulate what this question really means.
(This "why" question in most people boils down to "what is my purpose
or where do I fit in the grand scheme of things" or "how can my life
attain meaning?")
My answer to "the meaning of life," if you will, is that we have to
create one. Some people feel an emptiness that can be filled by a
religion. I think that emptiness can have causes and cures that have
nothing to do with religion. "The meaning of life" is something that we
have to create for ourselves. For many people, there is no question of
meaning. Those people have found what they love to do and they are busy
doing it. I recommend to everyone that they "do good things" and they
will feel that their lives have meaning. You don't have to be religious
to get that feeling of satisfaction. Just work for something that you
think is important and it will come to you. As Joseph Campbell used to
say "follow your bliss."
I think that this is a very reasonable attempt at the answer to this
question. In particular, I have certainly found that the "do good
things" plays a very prominant role in finding happiness in life.
Nevertheless, a significant number of people (including myself before I
became a Christian) find this answer does not satisfy. I have to tell
you that I struggled for many years to make this approach work, but it
just didn't.
I think that for me a big part of the process is found in your statement
- ""The meaning of life" is something that we have to create for
ourselves." I came to a point where I realised, in effect, that this is
a statement of faith. It is not preceded by "perhaps" - no it is the
crede of the non-agnostic atheist who is proclaiming that he/she is
certain that there is no ultimate truth of a more grandious nature.
I came to the point where my statement of atheistic faith came to seem
as unreasonable and untested as anything I was accusing Christians of
following. Indeed, when I seriously considered becoming a Christian, my
standards of evidence were much higher than any standards I had required
for other belief systems (atheism or Hinduism). Fortunately for me, I
did come across a lot of evidence, which was in the form of many
answered prayers. (Unfortunately for you, this evidence is very
personal, and so I cannot effectively communicate the strength of it to
you.)
In any case, the crede you propose (and, for example, I felt that this
was a major part of the message of movies like Woody Allen's "Hannah's
Sisters," although it is so long since I saw this movie I might change
my mind if I saw it again) is basically saying "the search for ultimate
meaning is too hard, so I've decided to give up and decide that there is
no ultimate meaning." I tried very hard to live by this crede, but my
inner being kept telling me that it was wrong, and that this "ultimate
meaning" I was really looking for was there to be found.
Stephen
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion