Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] FUSE programming?

[Mark Rages <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On 11/13/05, Mark Rages <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
>
> I found some bugs in the fuse-python implementation, specifically
> regarding getattr().  The Python wrapper was using the wrong number of
> arguments or something.  I'll try to search gmail for the bug report I
> submitted.

I found it, and it's not as serious a bug as I made it sound in the
above paragraph.  The maintainer says it's fixed now anyway.  Here is
my bug report:

On 8/10/05, Mark Rages <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> Your name's at the top of the file.
>
> I think you left out the "available blocks" field in the statfs()
> method of xmp.py in the fuse-python distribution.  I could prepare a
> patch if you want, but the fix is trivial.
>
> It took me a while to track it down, but I guess the example did a
> good job of teaching about fuse and fuse-python!
>
> Regards,
> Mark Rages
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
--
You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one.
  - fortune cookie

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion