Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
It's not so easy. If food is 10% of your expenses, and food costs 20%
more in one place than another, then that difference in food prices
should have a 2% effect on cost of living, right? But food prices
don't really vary much from place to place in the US. Housing prices
vary a lot, and housing is a big chunk of most people's expenses.
Also, housing prices are probably positively correlated with food
prices, although weakly.
As long as you add the different variables in dollars and not in
indivual comparisons it shouldn't matter what portion of your expenses
each is. If it takes $2000 a month to live in Missouri and $6000 in
California it really doesn't matter what percentage of that is food so
much as the total needed. So you could say that living in San Diego
costs 300% of living in the boonies of Missouri. It does seem to me that
if the pay increases with the cost of living that you're getting a deal
to move to the more expensive area though because most other items, such
as stuff ordered from Amazon, will stay the same cost.. so extra money
goes further.
For a job that pays $120k/annum, they should be flying you out there
for an interview and to look for housing. You should tell them that
you want to fly out to meet with them before you decide that you want
the job. They should also pay your moving expenses.
They already did have me out there at their expense and they will pay my
moving costs if I go with the job.
--
Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
http://kavlon.org
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion