Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?

Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
From: Mark Rages <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:25:55 -0500
Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 08:26:03 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gz6HHWxr3pL5tGf0jWS3DyARFy1ZVZvvdCpHx/+DUoM1QJ8MXRf2UBmUFlphkmA3/zoV23XCidE+H67u7iRuMqQoowmCk+q/A8twLAGZ2A6BR42tLFEd2hDePNdwyFQvNjYgXX9uop0bXVklySBlXOBJUi0cQFt3Q0dnlr8k1K4=
Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED

On 9/1/05, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Paul Slusarz wrote:
> >
> >
> >>: Screw the French Quarter.  Gimme the Food!
> >>
> >>This is funny, I thought the NO food was absolutely atrocious.
> >>I must've been unlucky, bacause the cajun food in the recently
> >>opened jazz place on Chapel Hill was much better
> 
> My wife and I went to Jazzes a while back, but I think we went at an off
> peak time.  Anyway, I have to admit we didn't like it that much.
> 
> Stephen

is it the same as the two Jazz restaurants in Kansas City?  It's wirth
going when they have live music.

Regards,
Mark
EMAIL:PROTECTED


-- 
You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one.
  - fortune cookie

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

References:
- [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: Jerry Gamblin <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: "Paul Slusarz" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: Jerry Gamblin <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: Jonathan King <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: Jerry Gamblin <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: Dave Lloyd <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: "Paul Slusarz" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: Dave Lloyd <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
  - From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <EMAIL:PROTECTED>

Prev by Date: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Hastert: Rebuilding New Orleans 'doesn't make sense to me'
Next by Date: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] looks like they finally have a shoot-to-kill order in N.O.
Previous by thread: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
Next by thread: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread