Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- To: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Subject: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] New Orleans.. RIP?
- From: Jerry Gamblin <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 10:57:13 -0500
- Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 10:57:51 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KT3rYwVJrGQ5kdhb+x5P91Z7QU7OSPBz2s9IC5RvtKhy3GEO+6Qg6FreyzMcPYfqgQnS6hvGU0DB0D3dMWBSiQ6snUgunQ6fLPTFgfZK1Flx8zE1CSxSXr5rV6d54ETCop9sTE5LtoGDWIjsGjlooxjf2Ge9RhZLzhjtiQSTVkQ=
- Envelope-to: EMAIL:PROTECTED
- In-reply-to: <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- References: <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Reply-to: MLUG Off-Topic Discussion <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
- Sender: EMAIL:PROTECTED
> I'm kind of a free market guy in this regard. What cities do people
> actually like to go to on vacation? On that scale, N.O. >>> St. Louis
> > (KC, Houston). Maybe more people go to Houston than I'm imagining,
> but N.O. is a *top* tourist draw, and that means that people aren't
> putting it in the same category as KC, STL, or Houston.
>
> jking
Do people go to N.O. for the history, the cities I named people do.
Most people go to N.O.To go down to the French Quarter to party. Does
that make it a historic city because it is a tourist destination? If
thats the case WaltDisney World and Las Vegas are off the charts in
the "historic" value market.
--
Thanks,
Jerry Gamblin
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Home | FAQ | Server | Presentations | Mailing Lists/Archives | Member Tools | Links | Sponsors | Contact