MLUG: Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] For Fruit Flies, Gene Shift Tilts SexOrientation
Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] For Fruit Flies, Gene Shift Tilts SexOrientation
Email address obfuscation in effect -- please click here to turn it off.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Jonathan King wrote:

On 6/7/05, Paul Slusarz <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:

I wonder why public "abstracts" for papers couldn't be written that way to encourage more involvement from the public.

This is in theory what the press people at the journals are supposed to do. What happens in reality is that the newspapers dumb stuff down so much that there's not much left by the time it's in the press.

Journals and universities will prepare press releases with quite a bit of technical detail. Much of that detail is dropped in most newspaper reports, but that is OK, if you ask me. The newspaper will gather additional information, mostly in the form of quotations from expert scientists who have no direct involvement with the research. Their opinions are very helpful sometimes and they are one of the things that make newspaper science articles worth reading even for scientists who are working in that area.


This is the journal's press release for the article we've been discussing:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-06/cp-sgi052705.php

Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion