Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Jonathan King wrote:
On 6/7/05, Paul Slusarz <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
I wonder why public "abstracts" for papers couldn't be written that
way to encourage more involvement from the public.
This is in theory what the press people at the journals are supposed to
do. What happens in reality is that the newspapers dumb stuff down so
much that there's not much left by the time it's in the press.
Journals and universities will prepare press releases with quite a bit of
technical detail. Much of that detail is dropped in most newspaper
reports, but that is OK, if you ask me. The newspaper will gather
additional information, mostly in the form of quotations from expert
scientists who have no direct involvement with the research. Their
opinions are very helpful sometimes and they are one of the things that
make newspaper science articles worth reading even for scientists who are
working in that area.
This is the journal's press release for the article we've been discussing:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-06/cp-sgi052705.php
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion