Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:35:26 -0600 (CST), Mike Miller
<EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Jonathan King wrote:
>
> >> address book
> >
> > No better than a paper one, if I needed one.
>
> Actually, it is much better than a paper one, and in many ways.
You actually sort of got me there. What contact information I have
(and it isn't that much) is almost all electronic. But I don't
generally find myself needing it when all I've got handy is what's in
my pocketses. :-)
> Integrated with a cell phone,
But I don't use a cell phone. OK, so what I've learned from this is
that IF you are a person who needs a cell phone, you'll probably find
all of the other stuff compelling. I'm not in that category.
> As long as you don't need a cell phone, and you don't have a lot of stuff
> (e.g., appointments) to keep track of, this is not for you. Around here,
> everyone uses PDAs. When we're in a meeting, we say "OK, when can we meet
> next? How about September 4?" Everyone whips out his PDA and everyone
> knows if he can make it on that date, then we add the appointment to our
> schedules. Done.
I have a wallet with a paper calendar in it; works about the same.
But it's also true that I don't have too many unpredictable meetings.
I travel twice a year and we take a vacation in the summer. I hate
making or receiving phone calls, and my life is so boring that
(outside of lunch) my location is well known at all times. Now the
interesting thing is that I used to know a ton of people who used
PDAs, but now I know very, very few people who do...unless they're
attached to a cell phone. I have to admit, that's not what I would
have predicted back in 1999.
jking
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion