Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Sure so you strip off all the fancy stuff and you are left with BSD.
So let me get that straight. I pay more for the equipment than I would
for a PC, strip off the lame OS so I can use BSD on it? Seems to me I
could pay less money on the equipment by buying an Intel type machine
and install free BSD on it and be ahead of the game.
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:16:40 -0600 (CST), Mike Miller
<EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Vern Green wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Mike Miller wrote:
> >
> >> I agree that the Macs are better. Who can resist OS X when the other
> >> major option is MS XP?
> >
> > I can resist it. I hate OS X. I have had some working with it, and
> > frankly give me a stripped down version of Linux that just does what I
> > need it to do.
> >
> > Windows XP went nuts trying to make their system more Mac-like. I hate
> > the soft warm and fuzzy graphics and the transitions, zips, fades, icons
> > that jump around and so on and on and on.
> >
> > I have reverted my XP installation back to a Classic view and I have
> > taken all those fancy pants nonsensical things and turned as many off as
> > I can.
> >
> > OS X is worse than Windows when it comes to this nonsense. I don't need
> > a leaping Icon to tell me what program I just clicked on.
>
>
> OK. So you don't like the pretty moving picture aspect of the GUI, but
> there's more to an OS than that. Does OS X offer no options for the
> desktop GUI? It is a BSD-based unix OS, right?
>
>
>
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
--
Thanks
F Vernon Green
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion