Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Edward Terry wrote:
>> I'm sure Ryan didn't mean that. A law against murder is not just based
>> on the immorality of murder, it is based on the right of the individual
>> not to be murdered. We have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit
>> of happiness, and to take away those rights must be illegal.
>
> Where do such rights come from?
>From us. We make them up.
> They can't be logically deduced or proven.
They are "considered to be self-evident." Read the Declaration of
Independence for more on this.
> We believe, based on emotion rather than logic, that people should have
> these rights.
Not really. Logic and historical analysis tell us what life is like with
and without basic human rights. We prefer freedom to slavery. Is that a
purely emotional choice, not logical? Perhaps, but it that seems a bit of
a stretch! Is it not logical to design a government that agrees with
human nature?
Am I the only one who thinks we shouldn't have to argue about the merits
of the rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness?
> We want the government to legislate morality by guaranteeing these
> rights.
What? You just lost me.
Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion