Email address obfuscation in effect -- please
click here to turn it off.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Jonathan King wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:45:17 -0600, Mikhail Kovalenko wrote:
>
>>I understand that a lot of money is being
>>burnt there but if you have any good ideas on suppressing unexpected
>>resistance movements during guerrilla war,
>
> But, Misha, the only people who didn't expect resistance and
> difficulties during the occupation were the folks at the AEI and their
> "they shall greet us with flowers" arm at the DOD! And the fact that
> none of the generals thought this was a good idea is both well-known
> and kinda proves the point.
>
Oh, I wasn't aware of that. Is that really the case?
>
>>>Instead, we are involved in some very
>>>expensive nation building that looks like it might fail badly.
>>
>>Iraq is going to be US's Chechnya, no doubt about it.
>
> God, I hope not. Chechnya is very different in that Russia did
> control the place and wanted to maintain sovereignty there at
> practically any cost, for reasons that are not completely sensible.
> Chechnya is a big reason why Russia is currently in such abyssmal
> shape, and why they're now stuck with Bush's good friend Vladimir
> Putin. Damn, if Iraq is our Chechnya, and Afghanistan becomes our
> Afghanistan, we'll be in far more seriously bad shape than even a
> cynic like me can easily imagine.
>
Agreed.
--
MK
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion