Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Wrong on Osama

[Vern Green <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Yeah, I was suspicious of them when I received that link as well. Of
course I am suspicious of every newspaper out there. The Wall Street
Journal is about the only reputable source out there, and you can
argue that too I'm sure.


On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:01:38 -0600, Jonathan King
<EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:28:04 -0600 (CST), Mike Miller
> <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I'll believe that story when I see it in a reputable newspaper.
> > The Post is famously shoddy.  They actually published a story claiming
> > that Kerry had selected Gephardt as his running mate.
> 
> This is true, but that's not why I'd be slamming the Post.  In *that*
> case they got burned by what had been a hot inside source,
> acknowledged the screw-up, and basically apologized.
> 
> It's the day-to-day junk they pull without any shame that gets me going...
> 
> jking
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> 


-- 
Thanks
F Vernon Green
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion