Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Was the president wired during the firstdebate?

[Vern Green <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

I was mistaken, Gibson was at the second debate, though if I remember
correctly you said the same odd lump was under the jacket on the
second debate as well. I might be mistaken about that, but I do
clearly recall someone making that connection on this board, maybe I
should go back and find it.

But more importantly let's get this straight. It is much more
plausible that there is medical device, transmitter or some other
foreign object under Bush's jacket in the first debate, perhaps even
the second debate. This object is not being talked about by anyone
other than a bunch of arm chair quarterbacks on the Internet. It has
not been mentioned by Kerry, Lehrer, Gibson, or anyone else involved
with either campaign or the debates. This object has now been
disavowed by the people closest to the president, but that can't be
true can it? After all these people are connected to the president and
have a vested interest in not telling the truth. Yet this mysterious
object only caught at one point of the debate I might add, is somehow
this all important thing in this election? Are you so blinded by your
hatred for Bush that you cannot see the idiocy of this argument? Here
we are arguing whether Bush had an object under his jacket or not.

Maybe it was agreed upon, but not reported that both candidates were
going to us these types of aids in the debate. Kerry could have his
cheat sheet, and Bush could have his remote receiver. Sounds as
plausible to me as anything else. In that case that would explain why
no one is talking about it.

Oh and for the mention of Kerry's cheat sheet:

http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc57.htm

I am not saying Kerry had a cheat sheet, don't make that assumption,
what I am saying is that this argument about Bush's bump in his back
holds about as much water as this report on Kerry's cheat sheet.


On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:11:30 -0500 (CDT), Mike Miller
<EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Vern Green wrote:
> 
> > Well I would tend to take Charles Gibson's word on it since he WAS
> > THERE! I mean seriously, the man reporting the news story was there, we
> > was within a few feet of both men, if there was something there don't
> > you think after everything that CBS has gone through he would want to
> > make sure the story is accurate? I mean after all he was there.
> 
> Charles Gibson was at the first debate?  He moderated the second debate
> and Jim Lehrer moderated the first debate.  Do you have a URL for Gibson's
> comments on the jacket issue?  Was Gibson standing behind Bush during the
> first debate?  I thought there were only cameras back there.
> 
> I video taped the first debate (from PBS).  Maybe I should watch it again,
> but I really doubt that watching it again would change my opinion.  It was
> extremely clear to me that there was something there.  I think that you
> didn't watch the debate (at least not the PBS version that I saw) and you
> have therefore not seen the obvious evidence and you should stop taking a
> strong position on something you don't know about.  The Republican talk
> about "left wing conspiracists" is just a bullshit distraction - there was
> something under the jacket, but no one knows what it was.
> 
> 
> 
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> 


-- 
Thanks
F Vernon Green
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion