Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Was the president wired during the firstdebate?

[George Robb <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

Has anyone thought of low profile Kevlar jackets?   I mean there are a 
lot of goof balls out there, and if it is an open forum that would be 
easy to get into, and he is on stage and thus an easy target, put two 
and two together, the secret service will take any advantage that they 
can get to stop a bullet...

http://www.segnow.com/Catalog/Chap_10/page16.htm  (take a look at the 
straps that are on the behind shots and then look at the angle the 
president is at...  the straps line up...)

Also why use a backpack transponder when you can transmit to a "hidden" 
in-ear receiver...  Two way communication is already there... Just tune 
your radio to NPR listen for the receive...  speak when you want to 
transmit could be done from miles away if you had the proper equipment...

Receivers can be made TINY...  Transmitters on the other hand are very 
difficult to make small...

But, then again...   I am a fool for conspiracy theories and everyone 
has posted great ideas :)   My two pennies...

George




Vern Green wrote:

>You know there are a couple more things about this.
>
>First, in my dealing with sound reinforcement for live performances, I
>can tell you that I have a wireless reciever that will run on a
>batteries
>
>http://www.shure.com/psm/psm600/default.asp
>
>These recievers are much much smaller than the one supposedly being
>worn by Bush and these are consumer products. I can imagine, in face
>as Michael points out, cellular technology is such you can have
>wireless two way communications smaller than this even. Take out the
>need for dialing numbers and the power pack, how large does a cell
>phone need to be? Certainly much smaller than this pack would be.
>
>Here is the other part of this. Do you think  Kerry would not have
>noticed this alien object growing out of his bacK? If I remember Kerry
>put his hand on Bush's back after the debate, would he have not seen
>it? If there was a object, and Kerry did see it, do you think he would
>keep quiet about it?
>
>This is an absurd notion, just like during the early 90s when the
>right wing groups were on about this huge government conspiracy.
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:37:10 -0700, Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
>  
>
>>>>You're telling me that Bush couldn't have used a mic and transceiver
>>>>that were way to small to see? This seems doubtful to me just because
>>>>I can't see him using something that clunky. I mean cmon.. the secret
>>>>service must have something better for him.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I don't know enough to say.  I do know that they would need to do it
>>>with little enough energy that it couldn't be recorded by a van full
>>>of equipment down the street.
>>>I would like to hear some expert opinion on that.
>>>      
>>>
>>Small with low energy usage and very short range signal isn't all that
>>difficult to do. (Small with long range would be much harder.) He must
>>have had secret service guys near him so it'd be no trick to have a tiny
>>transmitter that only had to reach to them. Such a transmitter could be
>>small enough to fit inside his ear with the speaker/mic so I don't see
>>why he'd have anything on his back. That box on his back would be bigger
>>than a cellphone even which would just be silly. And speaking of
>>cellphones - you could use similar tech to the better phones of today to
>>make the signal of such a device almost impossible to record. Their
>>signal uses rotated frequencies and is encrypted. I'd be surprised if
>>the President doesn't have access to tools at least that good.. and if
>>so why wouldn't he just put it in his pocket like a cellphone? Doing so
>>and nobody would even question why he had it. Why would he stick it to
>>his back? The whole idea is just silly. When you're hiding things you
>>don't make them stick out as unusual.
>>
>>--
>>Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
>>http://kavlon.org
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>discussion mailing list
>>EMAIL:PROTECTED
>>http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion