Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Was the president wired during the firstdebate?

[Vern Green <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

You know there are a couple more things about this.

First, in my dealing with sound reinforcement for live performances, I
can tell you that I have a wireless reciever that will run on a
batteries

http://www.shure.com/psm/psm600/default.asp

These recievers are much much smaller than the one supposedly being
worn by Bush and these are consumer products. I can imagine, in face
as Michael points out, cellular technology is such you can have
wireless two way communications smaller than this even. Take out the
need for dialing numbers and the power pack, how large does a cell
phone need to be? Certainly much smaller than this pack would be.

Here is the other part of this. Do you think  Kerry would not have
noticed this alien object growing out of his bacK? If I remember Kerry
put his hand on Bush's back after the debate, would he have not seen
it? If there was a object, and Kerry did see it, do you think he would
keep quiet about it?

This is an absurd notion, just like during the early 90s when the
right wing groups were on about this huge government conspiracy.




On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:37:10 -0700, Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> 
> >> You're telling me that Bush couldn't have used a mic and transceiver
> >> that were way to small to see? This seems doubtful to me just because
> >> I can't see him using something that clunky. I mean cmon.. the secret
> >> service must have something better for him.
> >
> > I don't know enough to say.  I do know that they would need to do it
> > with little enough energy that it couldn't be recorded by a van full
> > of equipment down the street.
> > I would like to hear some expert opinion on that.
> 
> Small with low energy usage and very short range signal isn't all that
> difficult to do. (Small with long range would be much harder.) He must
> have had secret service guys near him so it'd be no trick to have a tiny
> transmitter that only had to reach to them. Such a transmitter could be
> small enough to fit inside his ear with the speaker/mic so I don't see
> why he'd have anything on his back. That box on his back would be bigger
> than a cellphone even which would just be silly. And speaking of
> cellphones - you could use similar tech to the better phones of today to
> make the signal of such a device almost impossible to record. Their
> signal uses rotated frequencies and is encrypted. I'd be surprised if
> the President doesn't have access to tools at least that good.. and if
> so why wouldn't he just put it in his pocket like a cellphone? Doing so
> and nobody would even question why he had it. Why would he stick it to
> his back? The whole idea is just silly. When you're hiding things you
> don't make them stick out as unusual.
> 
> --
> Michael <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
> http://kavlon.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> 


-- 
Thanks
F Vernon Green
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion