Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] three debate surprises...

[Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Jonathan King wrote:

> Whether or not his debate style appealed to everybody, I don't think he 
> looked flippy floppy, he did seem relentless on the question of Osama 
> Bin Laden, and he did not once wind surf during the entire proceedings. 
> I think that would be called a trifecta in some places. :-)

I agree with Jon's assessment.  It was a winner for Kerry because he 
appeared strong and competent.  He did not seem weak and he did not seem 
unclear in his direction or plans.

Bush did fumble a bit, but I don't think it was killing him.  I think he 
didn't get an advantage on Kerry because he didn't do anything to 
distinguish himself.  He was just the Bush we are used to, maybe even a 
little less than that.

Issues?  I think Kerry did better, but that's just me.  Frankly, I don't 
think the real issues matter that much (to the effect of the debate on the 
election outcome) because most people who could be swayed by the debate 
don't understand the issues very well.  It's about style.  Kerry won.

Mike
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion